Get Chitika | Premium

Kamis, 28 Juni 2012

20 more banks were rigging interest rates: British bankers now facing criminal inquiry over scandal that was kept secret for years

  • Barclays shares drop 15 per cent as pressure on Diamond grows
  • George Osborne promises new criminal sanctions for market abusers
  • RBS, HSBC and Lloyds all named as under investigation as scandal widens

Hundreds of bankers across three continents are embroiled in the interest-rate fixing scandal that has left Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond fighting to save his job.
As pressure intensified on Britain’s highest paid banking boss to quit, MPs heard a string of other financial institutions across the world were under investigation.
At least 20 banks are believed to be under suspicion, with growing demands for a criminal investigation.
Barclays Bank Tower at Churchill Place, Docklands: The bank has been fined £290million over attempts to rig money market interest rates. HSBC is also under investigation, it emerged today
Barclays Bank Tower at Churchill Place, Docklands: The bank has been fined £290million over attempts to rig money market interest rates. HSBC is one of the twenty other banks also under investigation, it emerged today
Barclays’ shares crashed by 15.5 per cent in a day as the implications sank in, wiping £3.7billion from its value, with other banks also hit.
Barclays has been fined £290million after devastating emails revealed that its traders manipulated the London Interbank Rate (Libor) – the rate at which banks lend money to each other.
Chancellor George Osborne told the Commons the exchanges ‘read like an epitaph to an age of irresponsibility’.
On the blackest day for Britain’s finance industry since the 2008 economic crisis:
  • Serious Fraud Office investigators were revealed to be in talks with financial watchdogs over the scandal
  • David Cameron and Ed Miliband piled pressure on Mr Diamond to resign
  • Barclays and other banks were braced for a damning verdict today in an official report on mis-selling of complex loans to 28,000 small firms
  • Mr Osborne promised new criminal sanctions for those guilty of market abuse
  • Downing Street faced a growing clamour for a judge-led public inquiry into the ethics of Britain’s banks
'Epitaph to an age of irresponsibility': George Osborne today briefed MPs in the Commons about the unfolding bank trading scandal
'Epitaph to an age of irresponsibility': George Osborne today briefed MPs in the Commons about the unfolding bank trading scandal
David Cameron, who is at an EU summit in Brussels, described the situation as an ‘extremely serious scandal’.
Mr Diamond, who was in charge of Barclays Capital at the time traders are now known to have been rigging the market, has offered to forgo his short-term bonus for this year. But he is still entitled to millions of pounds in salary and long-term share incentives.
Asked how much wider the rate-fixing scandal might go, the Chancellor told MPs: ‘HSBC and RBS are two of the banks under investigation, but international banks such as UBS and Citigroup are under investigation too, partly for activities conducted in this country.’
Mr Osborne said the total impact on the economy and on individuals was ‘extremely difficult to work out, because the Libor rate was manipulated up as well as down’.
‘Sometimes the rate was too low for the true market price, and sometimes it was too high,’ he said.
‘The Financial Services Authority has made it clear, however, that that contributed to a risk to the country’s financial stability, and the cost of that is enormous.’ 
Tracey McDermott, director of enforcement at the FSA, said: ‘The initial indications are that Barclays was not the only firm that was involved in this.’
As well as RBS and HSBC, others under scrutiny include Lloyds, JPMorgan Chase, Germany’s Deutsche Bank and Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi.
A number of employees have already been fired, suspended or put on gardening leave at various banks including state-backed RBS, which has sacked and suspended ‘several’ staff, though the bank declined to comment.
Lloyds said it had suspended two traders. ICAP, the leading City broking firm headed by Tory donor Michael Spencer, has also been dragged into the scandal. It has suspended one employee and placed two on ‘administrative leave’.
A senior manager at U.S. giant Citigroup’s Japanese operation left the firm late last year after his division was temporarily banned from trading linked to Libor and its Tokyo equivalent, Tibor, by the authorities.
Giant Swiss bank UBS said it had approached regulators with information over abuses of the rate-setting system.
The Royal Bank of Scotland Headquarters
The headquarters of Lloyds Banking Group in the City of London
Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds are two other UK-based banks under scrutiny as part of the probe
The Libor rate is crucial, since it is a key benchmark for trillions of pounds’ worth of financial products.
The £290million fine on Barclays from the UK and U.S. authorities, issued on Wednesday, is likely to be only the beginning of a wave of punishments and civil suits for damages against other banks caught up in the global web of deceit.
Experts said banks might have to set aside billions of pounds in damages to cover their liabilities resulting from the conspiracy.
Former Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Lord Oakeshott said that once any criminal probe was underway, a public inquiry – like the one being conducted by Lord Leveson into media ethics – would have to be held.
'Clearly, the worms that are now crawling out from under the stones at the banking industry are even worse than any of us thought,’ he added.

THE WORDS THAT WILL COME BACK TO HAUNT BANK CHIEF

George Osborne, U.K. chancellor of the exchequer, left, and Bob Diamond, chief executive officer of Barclays Plc, participate in a session on the fourth day of the World Economic Forum (WEF) Annual Meeting 2011 in Davos, Switzerland
Speech: Bob Diamond alongside George Osborne at the Davos World Economic Forum
On 3 November 2011, Bob Diamond, chief executive of Barclays, delivered the BBC Today programme’s inaugural business lecture. Today, his words have come back to haunt him.
‘Rebuilding trust requires banks  to be better citizens. I believe  in this passionately.’
Within a few months of making this statement, Barclays was found guilty of a tax avoidance plot to rob taxpayers of around £500million.

Earlier in 2011, it had been found guilty of enticing elderly customers to gamble their life savings on the stock market. Around 12,000 customers lost half their savings. And this week it was found guilty of a ‘serious and widespread’ attempt to manipulate the Libor interest rates and ordered to pay a fine of £290million.

‘I know how angry customers are about issues such as payment protection insurance. That’s why we are working hard to clear claims as quickly as possible. We want to put things right.’
When a person takes out a credit card or personal loan, they buy the insurance to pay out if they lose their job, or have to stop working due to poor health. But banks, including Barclays, were selling the policies to people who did not need them. Barclays said the PPI scandal would cost them £1billion. Four months after making this speech, he admitted the bill had increased to £1.3billion.

‘But for me the evidence of culture is how people behave when no one is watching them. Our culture must be one where the interests of customers and clients are at the very heart of every decision we make, where we all act with trust and integrity.’
The Financial Services Authority this week found Barclays guilty of misconduct ‘extended over number of years’. The US Department of Justice said simply that the bank was guilty of ‘illegal conduct’ on its attempts to manipulate the Libor rate. The culture of Barclays allowed traders to manipulate Libor in a bid to make sure they scooped millions in bonuses, and to pretend the bank was in a healthier state than it was.

Read more:  

Sack them! Hang them! MPs deliver their collective verdict on bankers


And they’re off! Again. Here at that modern Tyburn, the scalp-hungry House of Commons, the politicians sensed a chance to beat up another estate of the realm.
A rival group of so-called leaders of society had been doing what they ought not to have done. MPs piled in with zeal.
Politicians had failed to pass laws which  might have prevented that misbehaviour. Politicians had sucked up to the malefactors, courting them over prawn cocktail for donations and approval. But the times are changing. Parliament is rediscovering its clout. Now the politicians competed with one another to ululate their disdain.
Gusto: George Osborne was looking forward to some juicy headlines
Gusto: George Osborne was looking forward to some juicy headlines
Bankers? Sack them, prosecute them, hang them! (And, er, let’s quickly find someone else to sponsor our next party conference.)
George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, hastened to the House with gusto. The latest economic figures were on the ropey side but this row would bag all the headlines and was, for Mr Osborne, much more juicy.
He made an unscheduled statement about Barclays/Libor (pronounced Lie-bour). What a humdinger. It even has a brooding baddie called Diamond and his sidekick Rich. We haven’t had names like that since The Pilgrim’s Progress.
Standing in: Labour's Rachel Reeves
Standing in: Labour's Rachel Reeves
Even sweeter for the Chancellor, his Labour opponent, Ed Balls, was absent from the premises. Poor Balls. Ghastly luck. He was making a speech to some conference in Birmingham (why?). His place was taken by Rachel Reeves, Labour’s  No 2 on money matters. With that voice and those feet is she Bernard Bresslaw’s long-lost brother? Or is it Harry H Corbett’s younger Steptoe?
Mr Osborne said that the banks had ‘elevated greed above all other concerns’. The Blair and Brown Governments had been ‘utterly clueless’ about taming the City beasts. As Chris Bryant (Lab, Rhondda) admitted: ‘We were in thrall to them.’ Mr Bryant, a former curate, wanted Mr Diamond to give evidence on oath when he is placed before the Treasury Select Committee.
Meanwhile, the Lib Dems’ Viscount Thurso spoke of ‘a sewer of systemically amoral dishonesty’ in the City. Sir Tony Baldry, second churches commissioner and Tory MP for Banbury, said the City must regain its ‘integrity’.
Our next hymn is….
‘Daily daylight robbery,’ said the SDLP’s Mark Durkan, who also wanted some knighthood-stripping of bankers. ‘Corrupt banksters,’ said Mike Gapes (Lab, Ilford S). ‘Bring the full force of the law against them,’ said Matt Hancock (Con, W Suffolk).
Jonathan Edwards (Pl Cymru, Carmarthen E) said that in Iceland they put bankers and even a former Prime Minister on trial. ‘Don’t tempt me!’ laughed Mr Osborne. Of Gordon Brown (Lab, Kirkcaldy & Cowdenbeath) there was nae sign.
Things started to spiral into madness when Andy Love (Lab, Edmonton) said he wanted the Financial Services Authority to send bankers emails headed ‘you’re nicked, big boy’. Has anyone ever called Mr Love ‘big boy’? Andrew Tyrie (Con, Chichester) said bluntly that Barclays had been ‘lying’.
Clive Efford (Lab, Eltham) said, with mounting fever, that ‘these people are thieves and criminals and have made beggars of our constituents’. Mr Osborne noted that the Labour government, which Mr Efford supported, had failed to do much to stop them.
Mr Efford flew off his trolley and had to be brought to order –  quickly and diplomatically – by  the excellent Deputy Speaker, Lindsay Hoyle.
Well, I think you get the drift. MPs were vexed. There was a certain amount of blaming of one another – Dennis Skinner (Lab, Bolsover) naturally thought it was all Margaret Thatcher’s fault – but the stronger impression was one of a Commons much less timid than in past Parliaments. Good.
For all the ripeness of some of the things said yesterday, for all the swiftness of heel shown by frontbenchers, a legislature which is more jealous of its powers is surely a better thing than past arrangements when the politicians lived in dread of upsetting a vested interest.
When Mr Diamond comes to Mr Tyrie’s Treasury Select Committee to ‘give us his answers’ (as Mr Osborne put it yesterday), Tyburn will be en fete.

Read more:

How many other banks will be drawn into the market-rigging scandal? Barclays is just the tip of the iceberg, say U.S. investigators

  • Analysts say penalties could dwarf the record £290m fine for Barclays
  • HSBC, RBS and Lloyds have all also been named in lawsuits
  • Regulators in Japan and Canada are also conducting investigations


The manipulation of Libor by Barclays is likely to be the ‘tip of the iceberg’ in terms of fraudulent activities by banks, according to a former head of the U.S. securities regulator.
Hervey Pitt, the former chairman of the Washington-based Securities and Exchange Commission, said: ‘It is in Barclays’ interest to prove the old adage that misery loves company and I expect they’ll be implicating a lot of their colleagues in other banks.
‘This is the proverbial tip of the iceberg.’
Money worries: RBS Group and other banks saw shares slump today as fears grew that they could be hit with huge fines
Money worries: RBS Group and other banks saw shares slump as fears grew they could be hit with huge fines
Dramatic: Shares in RBS Group were hit hard as details of the Barclays penalty rattled the banking sector
Dramatic: Shares in RBS Group were hit hard as details of the Barclays penalty rattled the banking sector
Barclays was fined £130million by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the largest penalty ever by the agency.
It has also agreed to pay £100million to the US Justice Department, whose criminal investigation continues.
The U.S. Justice Department decided to levy the fine rather than pursue litigation against Barclays.
Mr Pitt said this was a matter of ‘taking the bird in hand’ rather than risk taking action through the courts.
The £230million in fines in the U.S. makes up most of the £292million levied on Barclays and its subsidiaries on both sides of the Atlantic, following an agreement between regulators in Washington and London.
Under pressure: Lloyds Banking Group, led by chief executive Antonio Horta-Osario (pictured) is under investigation
Under pressure: RBS Group, led by chief executive Stephen Hester (pictured), is under investigation
Under pressure: Lloyds Banking Group and RBS Group, led by chief executives Antonio Horta-Osario (left) and Stephen Hester (right) respectively, are both under investigation
Scrutiny: Lloyds Banking Group's London headquarters. Analysts say huge fines could be imposed across the sector
Scrutiny: Lloyds Banking Group's London headquarters. Analysts say fines could be imposed across the sector
Devalued: Shares in Lloyds Banking Group slumped this morning but rallied slightly during the afternoon
Devalued: Shares in Lloyds Banking Group slumped yesterday morning but rallied slightly during the afternoon
Speaking to Bloomberg Television, Mr Pitt continued: ‘This is a phenomenal example of the ability of both the UK and the U.S. authorities to work together.
‘This really should give marketplace participants a lot of hope, and for those who are thinking of violating the law a lot of fear, that different governments will work together constructively and come up with cases of this nature.’
The massive fines are unlikely to be the end of the pain for Barclays.
Crisis: George Osborne told MPs that Barclays was 'not alone' in its efforts to rig interest rates
Crisis: George Osborne told MPs that Barclays was 'not alone' in its efforts to rig interest rates
The cost of lawsuits related to the Libor scandal are likely to be bigger, according to Sandy Chen, banking analyst at Cenkos Securities.
He added: ‘Since Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC and Lloyds Banking Group have also been named in lawsuits, we expect they will also face significant fines and damages.
‘We are pencilling in multi-year provisions that could run into the billions.’
The Barclays case follows co-ordinated investigations lasting years and is just the first in a series of potential cases against other financial firms, including HSBC, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase.
American regulators have issued subpoenas to banks including UBS, Citigroup, and Bank of America regarding how Libor rates are calculated.
Canada’s Competition Bureau is looking into the activities of Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan and others.
At least nine agencies have carried out investigations into Libor, including the Financial Services Authority in Britain and Japan’s Financial Supervisory Agency.
Authorities across the world are also looking into the activity surrounding similar interest benchmarks such as
Tibor, the Tokyo interbank rate, and Euribor, the eurozone rate.
Bart Chilton, commissioner of the CFTC, said: ‘This thing was about smoke, mirrors and sneaky backroom dealings with potentially dangerous effects on the world economy.’
He added that it was essential that there be ‘a sturdy firewall’ between bank workers involved in setting the Libor rate and traders.
Uncertainty: The scandal comes only days after RBS Group, which owns NatWest, suffered an embarrassing computer crisis
Uncertainty: The scandal comes only days after RBS Group, which owns NatWest, suffered an embarrassing computer crisis

Read more:

A new nightmare on Wall Street? U.S. banks face criminal probe into global interest rate-fixing scheme as Barclays blows the whistle on America's financial giants


Some of America's top banks are set to be dragged into a major criminal investigation of a global interest rate-fixing scandal about to engulf some of Wall Street's biggest institutions.
The worldwide probe centres on claims traders at Barclays colluded with rival banks to keep interest rates at levels to their benefit.
Barclays agreed to pay a whopping $453million in fines to the U.S. Justice Department and the UK's Financial Services Authority.
But it emerged tonight the bank had struck a deal of 'extraordinary co-operation' with regulators in Washington and London - potentially exposing collusion on interest rates among banks across the globe.
Settlement: Barclays agreed to pay a whopping $453million fine in an agreement struck with regulators in Washington, London and the U.S. Justice Department
Settlement: Barclays agreed to pay a whopping $453million fine in an agreement struck with regulators in Washington, London and the U.S. Justice Department
Cooperating: It is believed that part of Barclays Chief Executive Bob Diamond¿s agreement with U.S. authorities would be to give up other top banks around the world
Cooperating: It is believed that part of Barclays Chief Executive Bob Diamond¿s agreement with U.S. authorities would be to give up other top banks around the world
The bank admitted to manipulating key interest rates, increasing pressure on other banks to cooperate in a probe that could cost the financial industry billions of dollars.
The agreement came after coordinated investigations lasting years and is just the first in a series of potential cases against other financial firms, including HSBC, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase.
But it is Barclays' decision to co-operate with authorities that has sent a wave of panic through financial institutions across America.
It is believed that part of Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond’s agreement with American authorities would be to give up other top banks around the world who may be involved.

HOW BARCLAYS TRADERS CONSPIRED TO FIX THE MARKETS

Barclays PLC President Bob Diamond Between 2005 and 2009, more than 200 requests were sent, usually by email or instant messenger - by traders to the Barclays Libor submitters.
In one example of several provided by the FSA, a trader emailed the Barclays Libor submitter in March 2006, writing: 'The big day [has] arrived… My NYK are screaming at me about an unchanged 3(month) libor. As always, any help wd be greatly appreciated. What do you think you’ll go for 3(month)?'
The submitter replied: 'I am going 90 altho 91 is what I should be posting.'
The trader thanked him, saying: '..when I retire and write a book about this business your name will be written in golden letters.'
The submitter then replied: 'I would prefer this [to] not be in any book!'
In another example from April 2006, a trader requested low one month and three month US dollar Libor rates shortly before the submission was due.
He asked: 'If it’s not too late low 1m and 3m would be nice, but please feel free to say “no”... Coffees will be coming your way either way, just to say thank you for your help in the past few weeks.'

The submitter replied: 'Done... for you big boy.'
'This is the proverbial tip of the iceberg,' said Hervey Pitt, former chairman of the Washington-based Securities and Exchange Commission.
He added: 'It is in Barclays’ interest to prove the old adage that misery loves company and I expect they'll be implicating a lot of their colleagues in other banks.'
As a part of the deal, Barclays admitted its role in rigging the LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) and EURIBOR interbank crucial interest rates to mask the scale of their bad debts.
And American authorities say Barclays is not alone, with a number of other banks also taking part in a full-scale, global fraud.
A senior manager at Citigroup’s Japanese operation left the firm late last year after his division was temporarily banned from trading linked to Libor and its Tokyo equivalent, Tibor, by theauthorities.
Giant Swiss bank UBS said it had approached regulators with information over abuses of the rate-setting system.
The Libor rate is crucial, since it is a key benchmark for trillions of pounds’ worth of financial products.
The $450million fine on Barclays from the UK and U.S. authorities, issued on Wednesday, is likely to be only the beginning of a wave of punishments and civil suits for damages against other banks caught up in the global web of deceit.
Experts said banks might have to set aside billions of dollars in damages to cover their liabilities resulting from the conspiracy.
Between 2005 and 2009, certain Barclays traders requested that their LIBOR and EURIBOR submitters contribute rates that would benefit the financial positions held by those traders.
Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer said in a statement: ‘For years, traders at Barclays encouraged the manipulation of LIBOR and EURIBOR submissions in order to benefit their financial positions; and, in the midst of the financial crisis, Barclays management directed that U.S. Dollar LIBOR submissions be artificially lowered. 
‘For this illegal conduct, Barclays is paying a significant price.'
The requests were made by traders in New York and London, via electronic messages, telephone conversations and in-person conversations. 
The employees responsible for the LIBOR and EURIBOR submissions went along those requests numerous times in submitting the bank’s contributions, according to the Justice Department.
Difficult day: Barclays shares plunged over fears about the fate of its leadership and possible lawsuits in the wake of the scandal
Difficult day: Barclays shares plunged over fears about the fate of its leadership and possible lawsuits in the wake of the scandal
On some occasions, Barclays’ submissions affected the fixed interest rates.
The Justice Department’s assistant director in charge, James W. McJunkin, said in a statement: 'Barclays Bank’s illegal activity involved manipulating its submissions for benchmark interest rates in order to benefit its trading positions and the media’s perception of the bank’s financial health.'
In the UK, Labour leader Ed Miliband has also demanded a criminal probe into the interest rate scandal.
Asked how much wider the rate-fixing scandal might go, British Chancellor George Osborne told MPs: ‘HSBC and RBS are two of the banks under investigation, but international banks such as UBS and Citigroup are under investigation too, partly for activities conducted in this country.’
Mr Osborne said the total impact on the economy and on individuals was ‘extremely difficult to work out, because the Libor rate was manipulated up as well as down’.
‘Sometimes the rate was too low for the true market price, and sometimes it was too high,’ he said.
‘The Financial Services Authority has made it clear, however, that that contributed to a risk to the country’s financial stability, and the cost of that is enormous.’
At least eight agencies, including Britain's Financial Services Authority and Japan's Financial Supervisory Agency, have carried out probes into the LIBOR and EURIBOR scandal.
A broader LIBOR probe dates to at least 2011 and includes Japanese, Canadian and Swiss authorities.
Last year, UBS agreed to cooperate with U.S. investigators in exchange for conditional immunity from prosecution.
Earlier this year, in documents filed in Ontario Superior Court, a Canadian antitrust regulator said that a 'cooperating party' provided information on how the alleged LIBOR manipulation took place.

HOW BANK 'TRIED TO COVER ITS TRACKS AND LIED TO REGULATOR'

Barclays was yesterday shown to have ruthlessly covered up its attempts to manipulate interest rates, as well as lying to the City regulator.
Emails released by the Financial Services Authority reveal that a whistleblower warned the bank was being ‘dishonest by definition’, but was ignored by his boss.
On December 4, 2007 – just a few months after the credit crunch began – a Barclays worker emailed ‘Manager E’, laying out his fears about the bank’s behaviour.
But the bank failed to do anything about it, providing further damning evidence of a culture of fraud and manipulation.
In the email, the ‘submitter’ – the person responsible for filing the daily Libor rates to the British Bankers’ Association – said he was ‘feeling increasingly uncomfortable’.
He said: ‘My worry is that we [both Barclays and the contributor bank panel] are being seen to be contributing patently false rates.
‘We are therefore being dishonest by definition and are at risk of damaging our reputation in the market and with the regulators.’
If he had a ‘free hand’, he wanted to submit a one-month, dollar Libor rate of around 5.45 per cent, but he actually filed a rate of 5.30 per cent.
Although the bank’s compliance department contacted the FSA two days after the email was sent, it failed to tell the whole truth, the regulator said.
Its report states: ‘Compliance relayed an unspecific concern about the levels at which other banks were setting US dollar Libor (at rates lower than Barclays’ submissions).
‘Compliance did not inform the FSA that Barclays’ own submissions were incorrect or that the submitter’s determination of where Libor should be set was being over-ruled.’
It said Barclays had told it the submissions were ‘within a reasonable range and could be justified’.
On another occasion, the emails reveal that senior staff at the bank simply lied to the regulator when quizzed about Libor submissions.
On March 5, 2008, the FSA asked the bank’s ‘money market desk’ about its Libor rates. A submitter discussed his response with his manager, saying he wanted to file a rate of ‘Libor plus 20 [basis points]’ – but was told to file a lower rate.
The manager, ‘Manager D’, said: ‘Yeah, I wouldn’t go there for the moment... I would rather we sort of left that at like zero or something.’
The lower rate of Libor plus nothing was filed.
The submitter wrote: ‘It is a sad thing really, because, you know, if they’re [the FSA] truly trying to do something useful... it would be nice if they knew.’

Read more: 

Growing clamour for Diamond to go: Barclays chief could go in days after Cameron joins the attack

  • PM demands accountability 'all the way to the top of the organisation'
  • Labour leader Ed Miliband calls for criminal prosecutions for those involved 
  • Chancellor George Osborne says Diamond has 'questions to answer'
  • Vince Cable reminds MPs Government has power to disqualify directors

Britain's highest-paid banking boss Bob Diamond was last night under intense pressure to quit over the interest-rate fixing scandal after David Cameron suggested he must go.
The Barclays boss, who got £18million last year, said he would not take a multi-million-pound bonus this year after his bank was revealed to have conspired for years to fix a key borrowing rate.
But the leaders of both main political parties suggested that was not enough, with a growing expectation in Westminster that Mr Diamond will be forced out within days.
Not smiling anymore... Bob Diamond, chief executive of Barclays, has come under intense pressure to quit after his bank was revealed to have fiddled key market data
Not smiling anymore... Bob Diamond, chief executive of Barclays, has come under intense pressure to quit after staff at his bank were revealed to have fiddled key market data for years to fix their trades
The Prime Minister, speaking in Brussels where he is attending an EU summit, gave a strong signal that he believes Mr Diamond – who was in charge of Barclays Capital at the time the breaches happened between 2005 and 2009 – must fall on his sword.
‘People have to take responsibility for their actions and show how they’re going to be accountable for those actions,’ Mr Cameron said. ‘It’s very important that goes all the way to the top of the organisation.’
Mr Cameron said the whole management team at Barclays had ‘some serious questions to answer.
‘Who was responsible? Who was going to take responsibility? How are they being held accountable? These are issues they need to determine and determine quite rapidly.’
Labour leader Ed Miliband also piled pressure on Mr Diamond, calling for criminal prosecutions.
‘When ordinary people break the law they face charges, prosecution and punishment. We need to know who knew what, when, and criminal prosecutions should follow against those who broke the law,’ he said.
‘This cannot be about a slap on the wrist, a fine and the foregoing of bonuses. To believe that is the end of the matter would be totally wrong.’
Ed Miliband
British Prime Minister David Cameron arrives for a meeting of European Union leaders in Brussels
Rare agreement: Ed Miliband and David Cameron both indicated that Barclays management must take responsibility for their part in the scandal, with the Labour leader calling for prosecutions of those involved
In the Commons, Chancellor George Osborne said: ‘As far as the chief executive of Barclays is concerned, he has some very serious questions to answer today. What did he know and when did he know it?’
‘Who in the Barclays management was involved and who therefore should pay the price? It is quite right that the Treasury Select Committee has asked him to appear urgently to account for himself and for his bank.’
Liberal Democrat Business Secretary Vince Cable told MPs it was ‘premature’ to decide now whether Mr Diamond should be sacked, but pointed out that the Government had powers to disqualify directors.
He told the Business, Innovation and Skills committee: ‘There are last resort powers of director disqualification as you know, and we have many hundreds a year who are subject to that action.
‘If the facts suggested action – and obviously we would be subject to legal advice, this is a legal process – then indeed that could well follow. That certainly is a sanction open to us, yes.
Vince Cable pointed out that the Government had powers to disqualify directors, but said it was premature to say Mr Diamond should go
'Questions to answer': Vince Cable pointed out the Government could disqualify directors, but said it was 'premature' to decide Mr Diamond's fate
‘I think it is premature to decide what exactly should happen to Mr Diamond, whether it is in respect of his pay or tenure or any other.
‘He has a lot of questions to answer and I think some of those questions are actually going to be put when he comes before the Treasury Select Committee, which is right. Depending on what those questions produce, the people responsible for his company can decide on the appropriate action but I think it is seriously premature to decide now what action should be taken.’
Former Lib Dem Treasury spokesman Lord Oakeshott said: ‘If Bob Diamond has a scintilla of shame, he would resign. If Barclays’ board has an inch of backbone between them, they will sack him and put in a responsible, mainstream banker to clean out the cesspit.
‘I don’t think we need more investigation. We’ve seen quite clearly what was going on there in Barclays Capital, which for that time was under the direct control of Bob Diamond.
‘Frankly whether he knew what was going on or whether he didn’t, his position is equally hopeless.
‘If he knew, obviously he was colluding with it, if he didn’t know, you have a responsibility to make sure this sort of thing is not going on.

FIDDLED RATES 'ROBBED SMALL FIRM OWNERS OF THOUSANDS'

Small firms could be among the biggest victims of the ruthless attempts by Barclays and other banks to fiddle crucial interest rates, experts warned yesterday.
One leading accountant said the scandal was likely to have robbed tens of thousands of pounds from entrepreneurs when they sold their businesses.
This is because an entrepreneur who sells up may not get all the money immediately. They may get some cash, but are also given ‘loan notes’ by the buyer, which are the corporate equivalent of an ‘IOU’.
These loan notes pay interest – and the interest is typically linked to Libor.
Between 2005 and 2010, traders at  Barclays and other banks were systematically manipulating Libor rates for  their own greed or to improve the  bank’s image.
As a result, the interest that these entrepreneurs were paid on their loan notes was less than it should have been because of the action of the rogue traders.
Typically, the traders wanted to lower the rate of Libor, rather than raise it.
It is too early to know the scale of the problem, but it is likely to have hit vast numbers of entrepreneurs.
The accountant, who did not want to be named, said: ‘There must be entrepreneurs out there who sold their business in exchange for loan notes, and who have lost out from the artificial lowering of Libor.’
‘The reports make it quite clear that it wasn’t just traders who were rigging markets on this crucial interest rate, it was also senior managers who were aware of it. There are very tough tests in this country [to determine] whether you are allowed to be a chief executive of a major bank, you have to be a fit and proper person.
‘I’m afraid to say I don’t believe that on this evidence, and on the evidence of the aggressive tax avoidance that Barclays has been doing – remember it was only in February that Barclays had to effectively give £500million back to the Treasury for aggressive tax avoidance – I mean these sorts of things from a major bank are completely unacceptable. I just do not see, whether he knew or whether he didn’t, that it is possible for Bob Diamond to carry on in that job.’
Conservative MP Steve Baker said: ‘Yes, I do think Bob Diamond should resign, and I think more than that – the various authorities should be looking extremely carefully at whether any offences have been committed.’
Lord Myners, the former Labour City minister, said Barclays’ £59.5million fine from the Financial Services Authority, the City regulator, is ‘immaterial’, equal to ‘a few days’ trading profit’.
He described the bank’s behaviour as ‘the most corrosive failure of moral behaviour that I have seen in a major UK financial institution in my career’.
Martin Taylor, the former chief executive of Barclays, who left in 1998, seven years before the scandal began, said senior management must have known what was going on.
He said: ‘Somebody at a senior level somewhere would certainly have known. I cannot believe that Barclays has not identified who that is.’
Asked about Mr Diamond, he said he ‘may have known a bit’, but said he might be the best person to clean up the mess.
Dr Peter Hahn, a finance lecturer from Cass Business School, said the scandal is ‘a stain on the City of London and a stain that is likely to spread’. He added: ‘It is one that may not be removable.’

BARCLAYS 'TRIED TO COVER ITS TRACKS AND LIED TO REGULATOR'

Disclosure: Emails released by the Financial Services Authority reveal Barclays bosses ignored a whistleblower who warned the bank was being 'dishonest by definition'
Disclosure: Emails released by the Financial Services Authority reveal Barclays bosses ignored a whistleblower who warned the bank was being 'dishonest by definition'
Barclays was yesterday shown to have ruthlessly covered up its attempts to manipulate interest rates, as well as lying to the City regulator.
Emails released by the Financial Services Authority reveal that a whistleblower warned the bank was being ‘dishonest by definition’, but was ignored by his boss.
On December 4, 2007 – just a few months after the credit crunch began – a Barclays worker emailed ‘Manager E’, laying out his fears about the bank’s behaviour.
But the bank failed to do anything about it, providing further damning evidence of a culture of fraud and manipulation. In the email, the ‘submitter’ – the person responsible for filing the daily Libor rates to the British Bankers’ Association – said he was ‘feeling increasingly uncomfortable’.
He said: ‘My worry is that we [both Barclays and the contributor bank panel] are being seen to be contributing patently false rates.
‘We are therefore being dishonest by definition and are at risk of damaging our reputation in the market and with the regulators.’
If he had a ‘free hand’, he wanted to submit a one-month, American dollar Libor rate of around 5.45 per cent, but he actually filed a rate of 5.30 per cent.
Although the bank’s compliance department contacted the FSA two days after the email was sent, it failed to tell the whole truth, the regulator said.
Its report states: ‘Compliance relayed an unspecific concern about the levels at which other banks were setting US dollar Libor (at rates lower than Barclays’ submissions).
‘Compliance did not inform the FSA that Barclays’ own submissions were incorrect or that the submitter’s determination of where Libor should be set was being over-ruled.’
It said Barclays had told it the submissions were ‘within a reasonable range and could be justified’.
On another occasion, the emails reveal that senior staff at the bank simply lied to the regulator when quizzed about Libor submissions.
On March 5, 2008, the FSA asked the bank’s ‘money market desk’ about its Libor rates. A submitter discussed his response with his manager, saying he wanted to file a rate of ‘Libor plus 20 [basis points]’ – but was told to file a lower rate.
The manager, ‘Manager D’, said: ‘Yeah, I wouldn’t go there for the moment... I would rather we sort of left that at like zero or something.’ The lower rate of Libor plus nothing was filed.
The submitter wrote: ‘It is a sad thing really, because, you know, if they’re [the FSA] truly trying to do something useful... it would be nice if they knew.’

Bank boss who just won't say he's sorry

|
Bob Diamond last night broke his silence over the crisis which has engulfed his bank – but failed to say the word ‘sorry’.
In an unrepentant letter sent to a senior MP, the embattled Barclays boss admitted the bank’s behaviour had been ‘wholly inappropriate’ and ‘wrong’.
But the letter gives no hint that he is planning to fall on his sword as a result of the unfolding scandal over the fixing of interest rates. Nor was there any sign of profound contrition or shame over what has happened.
'We need to rebuild trust': Mr Diamond said he was planning a three-pronged attack on those found guilty of misreporting Libor rates, with options such as clawing back bonuses, withholding their pay or simply firing them
'We need to rebuild trust': Mr Diamond said he was planning a three-pronged attack on those found guilty of misreporting Libor rates, with options such as clawing back bonuses, withholding their pay or firing them
The letter, sent to Andrew Tyrie, the Tory MP and chairman of the Treasury select committee, reveals how Mr Diamond plans to deal with the rogue traders.
He says the bank is conducting ‘a review of employee conduct’ among all the workers caught up in the long-running Libor-fixing scandal, which he promises will be ‘rigorous’.
Mr Diamond said he was planning a three-pronged attack on those found guilty, with options such as clawing back bonuses, withholding their pay or simply firing them.
Mr Diamond, who says he is ‘happy’ to be grilled by the committee, who have asked him to urgently give  evidence, admits the bank made two grave errors.
First, he says traders at the bank tried to manipulate Libor – the rate at which banks borrow money from each other – ‘purely for their own benefit’.
He adds: ‘This is, of course, wholly inappropriate behaviour.
‘Barclays submissions [about Libor] should reflect the cost of interbank borrowing, rather than individual traders’ positions.’
Pugh on the ongoing banking scandal
The traders were trying to fiddle the Libor rate to make sure their own trades at the bank would pay off in the hope of scooping bonuses worth millions for their success.
Mr Diamond insists the ‘inappropriate conduct’ was limited to ‘a small number of people relative to the size of Barclays trading operations’.
He insists the bank ‘immediately’ took steps to stop this behaviour as soon as it came to light.
Second, Mr Diamond admits the bank also tried to manipulate the Libor rate during the credit crisis in a bid to try to improve its image from, what he called, ‘negative speculation’.
Lower Libor rates suggest a healthy, strong bank, which is why Barclays was keen to make the outside world believe it was not one of the banks in crisis.
He states: ‘I accept that the decision to lower submissions was wrong.’
In a sign of the catalogue of problems which Barclays is facing, from tax dodging to ripping off the elderly, Mr Diamond admits the firm’s reputation has been savaged.
He said: ‘We need to work every day to rebuild the trust that has been damaged by these actions and others that have come before them.’
He also insists the bank wants to be ‘a full corporate citizen, acting properly and fairly always’.
Mr Diamond said he was happy to appear before the select committee to answer questions – but with a  get-out clause that his words may be limited by ‘legal’ restrictions.

Read more:

Senin, 18 Juni 2012

Rebellions fail to call time on lavish payouts as Homeserve and LSE bosses get big pay packages

Two pay reports released last night showed that despite the increase in shareholder revolts over lavish reward deals, top executives are still receiving multi-million pound packages.
Homeserve’s boss Richard Harpin, whose torrid year has seen the domestic insurance group admit gaping holes in its safety net designed to prevent miss-selling, received almost £6million last year.
As well as a pay package worth £1.5million he bagged a further £4.5million in income from dividend payments. He owns almost 12 per cent of the domestic disaster insurer.
Rebellions: But top executives are still receiving multi-million pound packages
Rebellions: But top executives are still receiving multi-million pound packages
Harpin’s basic pay rose 2.5 per cent to £523,000, and he received benefits such as a car and medical cover worth £36,000. He also received shares from a long-term scheme, which paid out £952,000, but the stock has since fallen in value.
But because of the debacle, which has seen the City watchdog launch an investigation into the group and a collapse in its share price (down 2.6p at 151.1p), Harpin has waived a bonus that was worth £408,000 the previous year.

It comes as the pay package for Xavier Rolet, the boss of the London Stock Exchange Group, soared to more than £2.2million after he presided over a 35 per cent increase in profits in the year to March 31.
Rolet picked up a salary and bonus of £2.2million, a 13 per cent increase from the package of just under £2million last year. He also received a £174,000 pension contribution.
It’s been a lucrative few days for the Frenchman, who last week became eligible to cash in a £1.8million shares windfall from an earlier performance related bonus.
The LSE has been trying to branch out under Rolet, with shares almost doubling to 973.5p (down 9.5p yesterday) since he took over in 2009. British Airways owner IAG is next to face the Shareholder Spring at its annual ballot on Wednesday.

Read more:

G20 leaders set to boost IMF rescue funds as eurozone debt crisis dominates Mexico summit

By This Is Money Reporter
Leaders of the world's major economies are set to confirm they will make new crisis-fighting loans to the International Monetary Fund as they meet in Mexico today for a two-day summit.
The question of how to resolve the European debt crisis will be at the top of the agenda when the G20 heads of state meet today.
It is taking place amid growing concern about the state of the world economy and the impact of the eurozone crisis on the financial markets.

Uncertainty: Market volatility is expected to remain high amid fears over the future of the eurozone
Uncertainty: Market volatility is expected to remain high amid fears over the future of the eurozone
A second Greek election yesterday came only a week after Spain said it needed a 100billion-euro rescue deal for its banks, prompting concern that Italy would be next in line.
The crisis threatens to stretch Europe’s own rescue funds, underscoring the need for a bigger war chest at the IMF.
 
It remains unclear, however, whether all leaders attending the summit would sign off the specific size of their contributions to the Fund.
China’s vice finance minister Zhu Guangyao said on Sunday that Beijing will contribute to the $430 billion in new resources for the IMF, which was agreed by finance ministers in April, but he did not offer a specific sum.
'We are fully confident that the IMF will realize its aim of increasing its funds by $430billion and China w ill surely pitch in,' Zhu told reporters in the Mexican resort of Los Cabos.
Mr Cameron's comments are seen to be a sideswipe at French President Francois Hollande's auterity measures
German Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel
Under attack: Mr Cameron's speech is a sideswipe at French President Francois Hollande's, left, anti-austerity measures and a clear message to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, right, to put German cash behind the euro
Japanese finance minister Jun Azumi said he expected China to say how much it will give during the G20 summit, a move that could prompt other developing countries to follow suit.
Leading emerging nations China, Russia, Brazil and India did not say in April how much extra they would contribute to the IMF and sought to tie any new money to further IMF voting reforms that would give them more clout at the Fund.
The bulk of the extra IMF money will come from Europe. The Fund has stressed it is not earmarked for helping European countries exclusively but was for countries affected by the eurozone turmoil.
A G20 official told Reuters that China was expected to contribute around $60 billion, with Russia, India and Brazil providing $10 billion each.
The funding is aimed at helping the IMF respond decisively to the eurozone debt crisis. Greece, Ireland and Portugal have turned to the IMF for help after being locked out of debt markets. This month's offer of up to 100 billion euros to Spain to help its banks would come from Europe's own rescue funds.
Big issues: David Cameron will urge world leaders to 'get a grip on the eurozone crisis, debts, the challenges of growth and low competitiveness, protectionism and the failure to regulate the banking system
Big issues: David Cameron will urge world leaders to 'get a grip on the eurozone crisis, debts, the challenges of growth and low competitiveness, protectionism and the failure to regulate the banking system
David Cameron is set to address the summit today, and will warn that the world economy faces ‘five big threats’ that could lead to a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Prime Minister will urge world leaders to ‘get a grip’ on the eurozone crisis; debts; the challenges of growth and low competitiveness; protectionism; and the failure to regulate the banking system.
Both governments and business leaders will have to come together to make difficult decisions on each, or the ‘fight for the future of our global economy won’t be won’, Mr Cameron will say.
His speech is a clear swipe at France’s new socialist President Francois Hollande and others threatening to backslide on austerity measures.
Mr Cameron, addressing 300 of the world’s most important company bosses gathered in Los Cabos, will highlight five threats that could undermine a stable world economy.
‘First, instability in the eurozone – and the uncertainty and risk of contagion that brings,’ he will say.
‘Second, debt and the muddle-headed thinking that over-indebted governments can spend their way out of the crisis.  
‘Third, the failure to deliver the measures actually needed for sustainable growth: Namely monetary activism in the short term and structural reform to deliver competitiveness in the long term.
‘Fourth, the risk that faced with growing tensions in the global economy, instead of progressively reforming the imbalances in the world economy, governments will put up protectionist barriers, just like in the 1930s.
‘And fifth, the failure to follow through with the long-term reforms – particularly banking reforms and sensible financial regulation pioneered by the G20 which leaves us exposed to a repeat of the 2008 crisis all over again.
‘These five threats are very real, and let’s be clear, in a global economy they threaten us all.’
Mr Cameron will call for ‘courage, resolve and political commitment’, warning that it is easy to sign up to declarations at an international summit but ‘much harder’ to push through the difficult changes that are required.
He will also repeat his warning to eurozone leaders that the time has come either to let the single currency break up or to make the ‘sacrifices’ necessary to keep it together.
That will be seen as a blunt message to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose reluctance to put more German taxpayers’ cash behind the euro is frustrating the rest of the world.
On debt, Mr Cameron will deliver what will be seen as a swipe at Mr Hollande, who has already cancelled planned state pension age rises in France.
He will say: ‘We need to be absolutely clear about this and send an unequivocal message that deficit reduction and growth are not alternatives.
‘Dealing with the first is vital to securing the second. If a country wants growth in its national economy, then it has to deal with its debts, and dealing with its debts is every bit as essential for the global economy too.
‘Countries simply cannot continue to run indefinite structural fiscal deficits without contributing to the fundamental imbalances that fuelled the 2008 crisis in the first place.’
Mr Cameron will warn that in a debt-driven crisis, there is little space for countries to stimulate their economies through spending. Instead he will commend structural reforms – such as increases in pension ages – and loose monetary policy.

Read more:

SFO abandons its probe into property tycoon Vincent Tchenguiz

By Daily Mail ReporterThe Serious Fraud Office yesterday dropped its investigation into property tycoon Vincent Tchenguiz. It is a serious setback for the Government’s top financial crime-buster, which now faces the prospect of a large bill for damages.
The case raises questions over the SFO’s ability to handle large and complex cases, and over its future. The agency narrowly missed being dismantled last year, as part of a wider overhaul.
Setback: The SFO now faces the prospect of a large bill for damages
Setback: The SFO now faces the prospect of a large bill for damages
Vincent and his brother Robert have been embroiled in a long-running probe by the SFO into the collapse of Icelandic bank Kaupthing in 2008.

They were arrested in dawn raids on their homes and offices in March 2011, but the SFO was later forced to admit there were factual errors with the evidence it used to obtain search warrants.

 
David Green, who took over as a new broom director of the SFO earlier this year, said he would personally oversee an urgent review of the case.

The SFO confirmed that it yesterday morning wrote to Vincent Tchenguiz to inform him ‘there are now no longer reasonable grounds to consider him a suspect’ in the investigation into the collapse of Kaupthing Bank.

The SFO added that the review related only to Vincent and that there is no change to the status of Robert Tchenguiz. Vincent Tchenguiz said: ‘It is a huge relief that, under the new director of the SFO, this shadow has now been lifted and I can get on with rebuilding my life and my business interests.’

He added: ‘The damage, however, has still to be accounted for.’

Vincent wrote to the SFO last year to signal his intention to sue for damages, in a claim that could be as high as £100million. The SFO declined to comment on damages.

The case is one of a long line that have earned it the nickname the ‘Serious Farce Office’ in satirical magazine Private Eye. Controversies in recent years include the handling of a bribery investigation into the Al-Yamamah arms deal with Saudi Arabia.

One leading lawyer in the field, Barry Vitou of Pinsent Masons, said the SFO had used up ‘another of its nine lives’ and that Green must waste no time in delivering improvements.

Vitou said he had discovered the SFO’s new whistle-blowing hotline receives over 100 calls per month, but has yet to act on one of these tip-offs.

He added: ‘The Tchenguiz case has shown the SFO at its very worst: unable to get even some of the basics right.’

Read more: